Freedom of speech is a bitch…On one hand, it is the cornerstone of the American system and almost everyone praises it – at least in concept. On the other hand, it can also be infuriating. Most of us love the idea of free speech when it serves our interests but hate it when it doesn’t. This week Robert Unanue, the CEO of Goya foods, one of the largest Hispanic-owned companies in the country, was invited to the White House to participate in a Rose Garden ceremony where the president signed an executive order to promote Hispanic prosperity. At the event, Unanue boldly praised President Trump for his economic policies. The response to his comments from Latinos and Trump critics was swift and harsh on social media. Food bloggers, politicians, celebrities, and ordinary people circulated the hashtags #Goyaway and #boycottGoya in thousands of posts. Defenders of Unanue, criticized the boycotters for suppressing free speech, and Unanue himself said he would not apologize for the comments. Like everything these days, political lines are being drawn and stones are being thrown, as the debate intensifies on Twitter and Facebook.
My take on the Goya situation may surprise some people. First, free speech means the government cannot suppress your speech. That’s it; it doesn’t mean more than that. With few exceptions, people can express their views, no matter how controversial without censorship or punishment from the government. So Unanue, has every right to express his gratitude to President Trump and there is nothing our government can do about it. However, free speech does not mean we all have to like it or listen to it. In fact, free speech also means that if I don’t like what Unanue said, I can boycott his company’s products and urge others to do the same. As maddening as that may seem to both sides of the argument, everyone is acting within their rights in this case.
In recent years, people on both sides politically have called for boycotts. Some conservatives called for a boycott of the NFL when athletes were kneeling during the national anthem, and urged people to skip the musical, Hamilton, when Vice President Pence was booed at a show in Manhattan. Liberals have called for boycotts of the fast food chain, Chick-fil-A for supporting anti-LGBTQ+ policies and almost any company that advertises on Fox News. Both sides do it no matter what they claim. As a Latino, I don’t like seeing Latinos bicker with other Latinos in a destructive manner. My guess is that Goya employs a lot of Hispanics so a boycott could cause Latinos to lose jobs and suffer economically. I don’t like that.
I don’t know, Robert Unanue, but my sense is that he is a pretty smart guy who had to know that he was taking a risk for his company, when he praised this particular president. BTW – I don’t think this was purely a Democrat versus Republican thing. Unanue appeared at an event with Michelle Obama in 2012 and was honored by President Obama in 2011, and frankly, if Unanue had praised President Bush, I don’t think there would be many calls for a Goya boycott. However, publicly praising a president who has separated families at the border, called Mexican immigrants “rapists” and has spent his entire presidency trying to build a wall on the southern border is too much for a lot a people to handle. Personally, I don’t think the boycott will have a material impact on Goya’s business although if it continues, it may accelerate Robert Unanue’s departure. Being from SoCal, I don’t purchase Goya foods very often, so it wouldn’t be a big sacrifice to go without it. However, I support Unanue’s right to support the president and I also support the people who are calling for a boycott. Sounds like a cop out, but that’s how I feel. The Goya Foods controversy will play itself out, and I hope without a lot of Latino casualties. Freedom of speech has a price, but in my view, the price is worth it.
There are qualities in our community that no data point can fully capture, but this episode is about one of the biggest: grit. I talk about why perseverance, resilience, family, and purpose have always been among the greatest strengths of Hispanics and Latinos, and why those strengths can be a powerful advantage in a world being reshaped by technology, wealth, and access. But grit alone is not enough. If we want to translate all of that talent and determination into lasting economic and political power, we also need stronger networks, better platforms, and more intentional leadership. The opportunity is real. The question is whether we are ready to organize around it.
For years, we’ve been told that mass deportations would mean more jobs and higher wages for U.S.-born workers. But this episode looks at why the opposite may actually be happening. I break down new research showing how immigrant and U.S.-born workers often play complementary roles in the labor market, why removing one group can hurt the other, and how these policies may be making labor shortages, housing challenges, and economic instability even worse. This is a conversation about jobs, economics, and the unintended consequences too many people still refuse to confront.
Something important is shifting, and this episode is about why it matters. For a young and fast-growing community like ours, the rise of AI may be opening doors that were previously harder to reach — not by eliminating every barrier, but by expanding access to knowledge, tools, and opportunity at a scale we’ve never seen before. But access alone won’t determine who wins. This moment calls for strategy, community, and a serious commitment to turning potential into power. The opening is real. What happens next depends on what we do with it.