Former Countrywide and PennyMac executive Stanford L. Kurland passed away last week from COVID-19. The Wall Street Journal wrote about Kurland’s career focusing on his conflicts with Countrywide Financial founder, Angelo Mozilo. While Mozilo was a scrappy and flashy entrepreneur from the Bronx, Kurland was a polished former accountant from Los Angeles. Kurland famously left Countrywide before the company started its precipitous decline and was eventually sold to Bank of America. Kurland went on to found PennyMac Loan Services which today has a market cap of about $5 Billion. Like most stories about Countrywide, which at one time was the largest mortgage lender in America, the WSJ story portrayed Mozilo as selfish and misguided, while Kurland was portrayed as smart and calculating. I’m sure Stanford Kurland was a good man, and his success in the mortgage industry speaks for itself, but my experience with both men was different. Mozilo was supportive of NAHREP from day one. In 2000, he was the biggest name in the housing industry, yet he personally attended NAHREP’s kick-off event in March of 2000, not as a keynote speaker, but as a quiet observer. I was impressed by that. Mozilo gave me his private cell phone number after the event, and over the years he responded to every email and never turned down a proposal from me. He told me that when he started Countrywide, Latinos were his most loyal customers, and he will never forget it. Conversely, when Stanford Kurland started PennyMac, I reached out to him several times and never received a response. Granted PennyMac was largely a B2B correspondent lender at the time, yet I worked with several similar companies over the years. Kurland was never interested in anything we did at NAHREP. That doesn’t make him bad, it’s just a fact. Even though Stanford Kurland helped build Countrywide, he was never tainted by its eventual failure, and Mozilo became the image and scapegoat for the entire mortgage meltdown. Because of my personal experience, it always seemed a bit unfair to me. RIP, Stanford Kurland.
There is no shortage of data showing the impact Latinos are having on the U.S. economy, from GDP and entrepreneurship to workforce participation and homeownership. So why hasn’t that growth translated into the kind of economic and political power our numbers suggest it should? In this episode, I focus on two things we can actually control: building wealth and owning our narrative. Cultural influence matters, but ownership is what turns influence into lasting power. And if we want the next generation to inherit more than momentum, we need a strategy for converting our work ethic, growth, and economic contributions into the institutions and assets that shape this country.
The World Cup reminded the world just how magnetic Hispanic and Latino culture can be. In this episode, I talk about why that popularity is more than a cultural victory—it is an economic opportunity hiding in plain sight. From music, food, sports, and fashion to the global appeal of our biggest stars, our culture already has the power to shape markets and influence how people see us. The question now is whether our business and political leaders are ready to turn that momentum into capital, representation, and lasting power. This is a moment we cannot afford to waste.
The World Cup gave Hispanics and Latinos an extraordinary global stage, but the opportunity goes far beyond sports. In this episode, I look at how cultural influence can shape perception, attract investment, and ultimately create economic power. South Korea understood this decades ago and built a global strategy around making its culture impossible to ignore. Now, the world has seen the energy, pride, and creativity of our community on its biggest stage. The question is whether we recognize the value of that moment and build something lasting from it.