During Bill Clinton’s candidacy for president, more than a dozen women came forward with claims of sexual impropriety. His supporters said that his extracurricular sex life was none of anybody’s business and should not be a factor in his ability to govern. I was one of those people and I was wrong. Regardless of what people thought of Clinton’s governmental policies, his history with women and his lack of remorse should have disqualified him for presidency. His critics at the time asked how could America trust a person that has such little regard for common decency, and they were right. The problem is that most of those same critics are silent in the face of equal, if not greater, moral atrocities when a member of their own party is in power. The President of the United States is more than an instrument of the federal government; he or she is the leader of the free world and the foremost example of American values. This matters more than most people realize. The world is a complex and dangerous place and as much as we would like to believe that we can go it alone, the fact is we need the cooperation and support of a good chunk of the rest of the world to remain safe and prosperous. When the U.S. acts in a manner that is unethical and/or inhumane, our standing in the world diminishes and by extension our ability to influence the world to act in a peaceful and respectable manner diminishes with it. Our standing in the world is more important and much tougher to repair than our tax policies or financial regulations — and our treatment of refugees, immigrants, and the poor is more important when it comes to our relationship with our allies than having the right trade deals. We don’t have to agree with everything our political leaders do, but we should demand that they be respectable people. America needs moral and ethical leaders first and foremost; I understand that now more than ever.
The top real estate sales coaches, like Mike Ferry, flat out tell their students that representing buyers is for losers. Driving buyers around to open houses, dealing with fickle lenders, and filling out multiple offer forms is a lot of work. To make matters worse, after doing all that work, you still might not get paid if your buyers' offers aren't accepted.
By definition, unintended consequences are the results of an action different from what was expected or planned. They are often referenced in relation to changes in policies. I have heard the term used for years, primarily related to government policies. Still, I didn’t realize until recently that much has been written on the subject, and most experts believe that there are three categories of unintended consequences:
This week's big news in real estate was the settlement of the class action lawsuits directed against the National Association of Realtors (NAR)...Despite what you may have heard from the media, if the settlement is approved, this would be a modest victory for both realtors and homebuyers. The lawsuit's deeply misguided proponents, including Steve Brobeck from the Consumer Federation of America, have been calling for an outright ban on broker cooperation. In that regard, they didn't get what they wanted.